Kahuzi Biega National Park
UNESCO has classified the park as a World Heritage Site since 1980.[1] In 1997, it was listed as a World Heritage Site in danger.[2]
[1] UNESCO World Heritage Convention https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/137/.
[2] Kahuzi Biega National Park https://www.kahuzibieganationalparkcongo.org/.
Minority Rights Group.[1]
Environnement, Ressources Naturelles et Développement (ERND)
Survival International.[2]
Forest Peoples Programme.[3]
[1] Minority Rights Group
[2] Survival International https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/13710.
- Wildlife Conservation Society provides direct management of the Park, direct investments in land tenure, education, health, and economic opportunities for the Batwa and local communities.[1]
- Primate Expertise (PEx): A Congolese NGO, PEx specializes in great ape conservation and works closely with local communities to promote sustainable practices.
- Wild Earth Allies: Collaborates with PEx to support conservation efforts in KBNP, including research and community engagement initiatives.
- African Conservation Foundation (ACF): Works on the Kahuzi-Biega–Itombwe Wildlife Corridor project, aiming to connect KBNP with the Itombwe Natural Reserve to facilitate wildlife movement and habitat preservation.
- ICCOD-NGO: A local organization advocating for environmental protection and community rights, particularly in response to challenges faced by marginalized groups around KBNP.
- Minority Rights Group International (MRGI): Advocates for the rights of the Batwa people, documenting human rights violations and promoting accountability in conservation practices within KBNP.
- In addition to MRGI, other NGOs such as Rainforest Foundation UK, Amnesty International, and the Forest Peoples Programme have also advocated for the rights of the Batwa Peoples.
The Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN)Chairman of the Board of Directors is Mr. Bernard MIKOBI MAYINDA
Mobile number: +250-780-870-670
WhatsApp: +256-781-960-154
Email: info@kahuzibeiganationalparkcongo.org
On 13 April 2022, following the signing of a “Public Private Partnership” agreement with the Government of the DRC’s National Protected Area Agency (ICCN), the World Conservation Society became the main manager of the Park [1].
Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Water and Forests. [1]
- The Agency for International Development as well as U.S. Fish and the US Wildlife Service, Multinational Species Conservation Fund have been funding several conservation projects in the Park (Projects numbers AID-623-A-00-06-00074, F19AP00056, AID-660-A-13-00010, F16AP00857, F16AP00503, F15AP00743, Activity Id:49963) implemented by the U.S. Government - Department of Interior, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society and the Kitabi College Of Conservation and Environmental Management in 2004,2006, 2007-2010, 2012-2019, 2021-2022[1].
- Wildlife Conservation Society
- Germany: Since 2008, KfW has been supporting the ICCN in managing the park on behalf of the German federal government [2]. In 2024, the German government committed €64 million to the East African Community (EAC). Of this amount, €5 million was earmarked for strengthening environmental conservation and enhancing the EAC’s capacity to manage nature-based solutions. As a member of the EAC, the Democratic Republic of the Congo is expected to benefit from this funding.[3] France was set to fund the park, but it removed its plan to fund it.[4]
- UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024
- United Nations Foundation (UNF), the Governments of Italy and Belgium, and the Rapid Response Facility (RRF), USD 1,003,900. [5]
- Government of Norway (2021-2022) USD 300,000.[6]
KBNP is a militarized protected area and tourist destination that became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1980.[1] However, the site was first created in the era of Belgian colonial rule with the establishment of ‘The Zoological and Forest Reserve of Mount Kahuzi’ via colonial decree in 1937.[2] In 1951, the Belgians extended this reserve to include Mount Biega, which began the conflict that emerged in the coming decades between the park officials, the international community, and the forest-dwelling Indigenous Peoples known as the Batwa of Kahuzi-Biega.[3] International donors fund the park's activities and thus impact its behavior as an institution. However, funders also support a militarized approach to conservation that allows park officials to engage in brutal tactics to keep the Indigenous Peoples out of the park, which results in egregious human rights violations.[4] The Batwa of Kahuzi-Biega have inhabited the forests around the volcanic mountains of Kahuzi and Biega since time immemorial. They are identified as small, hunter-gatherer communities with a deep connection to their natural surroundings.[5] The forests for these Indigenous Peoples represent the center of “intellectual, spiritual, and cultural life, a core part of their collective and individual identity. Leveraging their intimate knowledge of the region’s plants and animals cultivated over centuries.”[6] They sustain themselves through a variety of foods, medicinal, and alternative fuel sources. The forests are also where they bury their ancestors and perform sacred cultural practices; therefore, for these reasons, the community derives its distinct identity from its relationship with the forest.[7] Although these Indigenous Peoples were able to continue living on their ancestral lands and continue cultural practices during the Belgian colonial era, subsequent years were characterized by the removal of Indigenous Peoples.[8]
Forceful evictions began when Belgian conservationist Adrien Deschryver lobbied the Congolese government to expand the protected area and evict the Indigenous Peoples living inside it. Initially, Deschryver sought the Indigenous Batwa Peoples for assistance in guiding him through the forest and tracking the gorillas.[1] Using the Batwa’s intimate knowledge to gain access to the forest, he returned with armed park guards in the 1970s to violently force Batwa out of their villages and the park altogether.[2] The majority of the Batwa people were expelled in 1975 when a lowland sector was expanded onto the park.[3] More than 6,000 Batwa were evicted from their lands without any food or support.[4] The community was not given any resettlement options; therefore, they were to live as squatters dependent on non-Batwa host communities.[5] The violence continues today.[6] For example, in November 2021, seven villages were targeted and burnt to the ground by KBNP park officials. At least 5 Batwa were killed and 20 Batwa women were subjected to mass group rape by soldiers and park officials.[7]
Destruction of private properties:
- When the Indigenous Peoples were forcefully evicted, the park officials burnt their villages to the ground along with the sacred sites, where they buried their ancestors.[8] Arson continues today, and this was not an isolated incident. Since 2017, more than 12 indigenous villages have been allegedly burned (some were burned twice; Buhoyi village was burned three times).[9]
Compensation:
- No compensation was given to the Indigenous Peoples for the dispossession of their land, nor any opportunities for resettlement.[10]
Removal of traditional practices:
- They no longer had access to the forest for hunting and gathering; therefore, they are losing their traditional practices, negatively impacting their whole identity.[11]
Rights to food and adequate standards of living:
- As a result of the forceful evictions, 50 percent of those expelled from the forest died in the following two decades due to poverty, material deprivation, malnourishment, disease, etc.[12]
Arbitrary arrests and detentions:
- From 2017 to 2022, 17 Batwa allegedly faced arbitrary arrests and detentions in prison; 14 were later released when lawyers intervened, 2 died due to poor prison conditions, and one remains in jail on what is widely viewed as political charges.[13]
Extrajudicial killings and murders:
- From 2017 to 2022, 29 Batwa were allegedly killed by ecoguards and/or soldiers, including minors; 16 Batwa 20 were allegedly wounded or threatened to be killed. [14]
- In 2020 10 Eco guards in two national parks Kahuzi Biega and Salonga National Parks were convicted of serious crimes of murder, rape, torture and causing actual bodily harm[15]. These human rights abuses were perpetrated against the Batwa Indigenous Peoples. The court imprisoned the convicted to jail terms ranging from 5 to 20 years and further ordered compensation to the victims by the ranger's employer, the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN).
Sexual gender-based violence:
- Batwa women have been subject to group and individual rape by soldiers and park officials.[16] Between 2019 and 2021, joint contingents of park guards and Congolese Army soldiers allegedly group-raped at least 15 Batwa women.[17]
Torture and ill-treatment:
- Minority Rights Group said that eyewitnesses have seen park officials and soldiers allegedly burning down homes, some with children inside, then forcing all the doors to the home shut while watching children try to escape.[18] Between 2019 and 2021, joint contingents of park guards and Congolese Army soldiers would have allegedly burned alive at least 2 persons.[19]
- Park officials and soldiers have allegedly mutilated Batwa corpses in front of Batwa Indigenous Peoples and taken them home. removed fingers as trophies.[20] In this attack that took place on 3 December 2021, a Batwa community member narrated to the MRG investigator that a teenager who confronted the park guards with a spear was shot dead, and his hand was cut off and taken as a trophy.
The Kahuzi-Biega National Park (PNKB) employs a heavily militarized conservation model that leads to human rights violations against the Batwa. Ecoguards are armed with military-grade weapons, use advanced monitoring technologies, conduct joint patrols with the Congolese army (FARDC), and are rangers who have received paramilitary training from international partners.[21]
A report indicates that the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) was aware of unresolved human rights abuse allegations against the Batwa, including warnings in May 2019 that eco-guards from Kahuzi-Biega National Park (PNKB) were shooting at and threatening Batwa community members. [22] In April 2022, the WCS issued a statement expressing concerns over allegations of human rights violations committed against the Batwa People. It announced its support for an independent and credible investigation that would lead to accountability and redress for violations. The WCS with the Government of DRC’s National Protected Area Agency (ICCN) announced the signature of a new Public-Private-Partnership for the management of the Kahuzi-Biega National Park. The PPP is a framework for a new model for the management of this park aimed at protecting the unique wildlife and habitats of the KBNP and center the rights of the Batwa Indigenous Peoples and local communities by enabling them to be active and influential partners and constituents in a shared vision and future for Kahuzi-Biega National Park’s governance and management.[23]
German and U.S. development agencies have funded the militarized and fortress-style conservation approaches used in Kahuzi-Biega National Park (PNKB), without considering the social impacts on the Batwa community. These donors do not proactively monitor human rights issues, and existing mechanisms fail to inform them fully of violations, leaving them unaware of the violent consequences of this conservation model. When informed of abuse, their responses have been inadequate.[24]
In 2015, the US Fish and Wildlife Service partnered with the WCS in a project in the PNKB aimed at improving law enforcement and wildlife security[25]. The US Fish and Wildlife Service received funding from the US government, and with the recent denouncement of climate action by the new administration, such partnership may be discontinued. Even with these developments, the Batwa still hold the view that ICCN sometimes, with the support of the military arm (FARDC) in the DRC, is violating their rights.[26]
A report indicates that since 1983, GIZ has supported the PNKB, including increasing patrols around the park. Consistently supported socio-economic development projects in villages surrounding the park, some directed to favor the sensitization of the Batwa people. German development actors prioritized modest socio-economic development in villages surrounding protected areas over any meaningful consultation and participation of Indigenous Peoples in protected area management or benefit-sharing schemes.[27] In 2000, the ICCN and GIZ promoted the creation of the Community Conservation Committees (CCCs) as a body to improve Batwa participation or communication with the park authorities since they had no decision-making power. However, CCCs lack independence and can’t comply with their function.[28] In addition to technical assistance offered by GIZ, Germany provides significant funding to the PNKB through KfW, which has co-financed the park since 2008.
[1] Minority Rights Group, “To Purge the Forest by Force: Organized violence against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park,” at 11.
[2] Ibid, 13.
[3] Ibid, 13.
[5] Ibid, 13.
[6] Minority Rights Group, “To Purge the Forest by Force: Organized violence against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park,” at 3.
[7] Ibid, 7.
[8] Ibid, 13.
[10] Ibid, 13.
[11] Ibid, 13.
[12] Ibid, 13.
[15] The Bukavu Garrison Military Court (TMGB) handed down the verdict in the case of Jean-Marie Kasula and 7 co-defendats. And https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/coercive-conservation-on-trial-democratic-republic-congo-kahuzi-biega-ecoguards#:~:text=In%20the%20final%20days%20of,Biega%20and%20Salonga%20National%20Parks.
[16] Minority Rights Group, “To Purge the Forest by Force: Organized violence against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park,” at 7.
[18] Ibid, 7.
[19] https://minorityrights.org/programmes/library/pnkb/ and. https://initiativeforequality.org/wp-content/uploads/Report-What-Happens-in-the-Park-Rev-Jan-2022.pdf; https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/press-release/2022/batwa-community-den…
[20] Ibid, 7.
[23] https://newsroom.wcs.org/News-Releases/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/17462/New-Management-Agreement-Signed-for-Kahuzi-Biega-National-Park-in-the-DRC.aspx?_gl=1*1gnq33y*_gcl_au*MjczNTQ4MzE2LjE3MzkyNjQ3OTY.*_ga*MjA2NjQ3OTQyOS4xNzM5MjY0Nzk1*_ga_BTX9HXMYSX*MTczOTI2NDc5Ni4xLjAuMTczOTI2NDc5Ni42MC4wLjA..
[25] US Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation FY2015 Summary of Projects, AFR 1514, Grant #F15AP00743.https://www.fws.gov/media/africa-regional-program-project-summaries-201…;
In 2020, 10 rangers were found guilty of murder, rape, torture, and bodily harm against Batwa Indigenous Peoples.[1]
In 2008, with support from the local organization Environnement Ressources Naturelles et Développement (ERND Institute), the Batwa filed a case challenging violations of their rights to property, non-discrimination, and cultural heritage. The Tribunal de Grande Instance dismissed the case in 2008, followed by the Court of Appeal. In 2013, the case was submitted to the Supreme Court, where it remains pending.[2]
[1] Forest Peoples Programme, Coercive conservation on trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/coercive-conservation-on-trial-democratic-republic-congo-kahuzi-biega-ecoguards#:~:text=In%20the%20PNKB%20case%2C%20decided,three%20of%20actual%20bodily%20harm.
[2] Minority Rights Group, Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting Batwa land rights https://minorityrights.org/2016/11/15/minority-rights-group-international-et-environnement-ressources-naturelles-et-developpement-au-nom-des-batwa-du-parc-national-de-kahuzi-biega-rdc-v-republique-democratique-du-congo-rdc/
- Constitution (2006)
- National Land Policy (2021)
- National law No. 22/030 on the protection and promotion of Indigenous Pygmy people’s rights (2022)
- Law No. 14/003 on Protection of the Nature (2014)
- Community Forestry Decree No 14/018 (2014)
The Zoological and Forest Reserve of Mount Kahuzi’ 1937.
Forest Peoples Programme, Coercive conservation on trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo https://www.forestpeoples.org/en/coercive-conservation-on-trial-democratic-republic-congo-kahuzi-biega-ecoguards#:~:text=In%20the%20PNKB%20case%2C%20decided,three%20of%20actual%20bodily%20harm.
Kahuzi Biega National Park https://www.kahuzibieganationalparkcongo.org/.
Minority Rights Group https://minorityrights.org/programmes/library/trends/trends2022/drc/#:~:text=Batwa%20of%20the%20Kahuzi%2DBiega,the%20park%20derives%20its%20name.
Minority Rights Group, Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting Batwa land rights https://minorityrights.org/2016/11/15/minority-rights-group-international-et-environnement-ressources-naturelles-et-developpement-au-nom-des-batwa-du-parc-national-de-kahuzi-biega-rdc-v-republique-democratique-du-congo-rdc/
Minority Rights Group, Fortress Conservation and International Accountability for Human Rights Violations against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, https://minorityrights.org/resources/fortress-conservation-and-internat…
Minority Rights Group, “To Purge the Forest by Force: Organized violence against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park.” https://minorityrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/MRG_InvRep_DRC_EN_Apr22v3_1.pdf
Mongabay https://news.mongabay.com/2022/01/what-went-wrong-with-conservation-at-kahuzi-biega-national-park-and-how-to-transform-it-commentary/.
Survival International https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/13710.
UNESCO World Heritage Convention https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/137/.
IUCN https://whakatane-mechanism.org/fr/democratic-rebublic-congo.
UNITED NATIONS (U.N.) SYSTEM
The UN human rights treaty bodies and the Human Rights Council have highlighted, on several occasions, the human rights abuses occurring in the Kahuzi-Biega National Park (PNKB):
- In 2022, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights expressed concern “about acts of violence and intimidation committed against the communities concerned, including against the 'eco-guards' working in natural parks (arts. 1 and 11)”. And recommended the State party:” Prevent acts of violence and intimidation against the communities concerned and the eco-guards working in natural parks, and guarantee effective protection for them, including through the intermediary of the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation.”[1]
- During the 2014 UPR review, Mexico recommended: “ Ensure land rights of indigenous communities within protected natural parks, in particular Pygmies. Likewise harmonize projects of greenhouse gas reduction, deforestation reduction and forest degradation in line with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”[2]
- During the 2019 (A/HRC/42/5) and 2024 (A/HRC/58/6) UPR reviews, several States recommended that the Democratic Republic of the Congo address the human rights situation of the Batwa Peoples.
- In 2018, several UN Special Rapporteurs—including the Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples—sent a joint communication to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, expressing serious concern over the killing of Mobutu Nakulire Munganga and his son in the KBNP.[3]
UNESCO
In 1997 UNESCO World Heritage inscribed Kahuzi Biega National Park (KBNP) in the list of World Heritage in Danger due to severe threats to the park’s integrity, primarily related to civil unrest and armed conflicts in the region, widespread poaching, illegal mining, deforestation, and displacement of communities, which severely impacted the park's ecosystem and endangered species, including the Eastern Lowland Gorilla.
UNESCO World Heritage Committee, in its decisions from 2021, has expressed concerns for the reports of alleged human rights abuses towards Indigenous Peoples and calls upon the State to take measures to address them.[4] Among these measures: establish a national code of conduct for eco-guards, a grievance mechanism for human rights abuses, and train all staff on human rights issues as part of regular law enforcement training, as well as ensuring that management processes are founded on a rights-based approach.
AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM
In March and August 2021, the Working Group on Indigenous Populations/Communities of the African Commission sent a letter of appeal to the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to express concerns about the killings of Indigenous Batwa in an Army operation aimed at dislodging Batwa from the Kahuzi-Biega National Park.[5]
In July 2024, the African Commission of Human and Peoples Rights adopted the Communication 588/15 Minority Rights Group International et Environnement Ressources Naturelles et Developpement (au nom des Batwa du Parc National de Kahuzi Biega, RDC) v Republique Democratique du Congo (RDC).
Key recommendations from the Commission to the DRC government include:
- A full public apology to the Batwa, acknowledging the deadly abuse by eco-guards, eviction-related deaths, and the inhumane living conditions to which the Batwa have been subjected;
- Legally recognize Batwa as full citizens of the DRC;
- Pay compensation to the Batwa.
- Demarcate and grant collective titles to Batwa over ancestral territories within the PNKB;
- Establish a community development fund and share park revenues with the Batwa.
- Withdraw non-Batwa persons from Batwa ancestral lands.
On August 2, 2024, the Batwa People issued a press statement urging the African Commission to follow up on the implementation of these recommendations. They called on all levels of government in the DRC to respect the commitments contained in ratified treaties and agreements, as well as national laws. International partners, including the University of Arizona’s IPLP Protected Areas Initiative, have expressed strong support for the Batwa People and welcomed the Commission’s decision.[6]
However, as of November 2024, neither the DRC government nor park officials have commented on the possibility of implementing the decision.[7] On November 13, 2024, the government of the DRC issued a Provincial Decree N°24/279/GP/SK, which orders the protection of the PNKB and prohibits the occupation, invasion, exploitation, commercialization, and transport of forest and mining resources from the park. While the decree correctly identifies armed groups in the PNKB as a threat due to illicit resource extraction, its broad and undifferentiated application to Batwa communities raises serious concerns. In particular, the decree fails to take into account the decision of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and relevant human rights standards concerning Indigenous Peoples. [8]
ICCN
In January 2022, the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) established a Commission of Inquiry into Alleged Violations Committed by ICCN Personnel in the Kahuzi-Biega National Park, particularly against the Batwa Indigenous community, which occurred between 2019 and 2021. The final report, containing some recommendations for the ICCN, was published in June 2022.[1] The findings of the inquiry, which was funded by the German government, dismissed many of the allegations, including claims of widespread atrocities. Observers, such as Minority Rights Group (MRG) and journalist Robert Flummerfelt, condemned the investigation as a cover-up. They argued that the commission, led by the ICCN, was compromised by a conflict of interest since the ICCN was essentially investigating its own personnel. Moreover, there were serious concerns regarding witness intimidation during the inquiry.[2] Additionally, some of the most egregious abuses, such as group rape and extrajudicial killings, were discounted by the commission based on questionable standards of evidence. [3]
GERMANY
When requests were submitted to KfW and GIZ for disclosure of financial and technical support provided to PNKB, both entities refused to release the information, citing the German Freedom of Information Act (Informationsfreiheitsgesetz). They claimed that, as organizations operating under private law, they are not considered public authorities subject to such requests.[4]
In September 2017, Mobutu Nakulire Munganga formally lodged a complaint with KfW and GIZ, describing how his 17-year-old son, Christian Nakulire, was shot and killed within PNKB. Further complaints followed, including one in 2019, when KfW was directly informed—via correspondence from a German Member of Parliament—of the killing of Matabashi Teso, a Batwa man, by PNKB ecoguards on April 24, 2019.[5]
The German government has stated that it addresses allegations of human rights violations by working directly with local partners, such as ICCN. If such allegations remain unresolved, German development actors have the authority to sanction partners, including suspending payments under relevant contracts. However, the continued denial of the systemic nature of these violations has allowed the German government to avoid conducting a comprehensive review of the human rights implications of its biodiversity support in the region.[6]
In January 2020, the BMZ (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) temporarily suspended funding to ICCN. In 2022, with German financial support, the ICCN established the aforementioned Commission of Inquiry to investigate the alleged abuses in PNKB.[7]
Recently, KfW reported that it had secured 35 hectares of land for the Batwa community:[8] However, as of May 2025, no updates on the implementation or handover of the land have been made available.
[2] https://minorityrights.org/human-rights-abuses-in-pnkb-so-called-independent-findings-of-iccn-investigation-cannot-be-taken-at-face-value/; https://www.ajiunit.com/article/german-funded-inquiry-into-drc-atrociti…
[3] https://minorityrights.org/human-rights-abuses-in-pnkb-so-called-independent-findings-of-iccn-investigation-cannot-be-taken-at-face-value/.
[5] Fortress Conservation and International Accountability for Human Rights Violations Against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, p. 37-38
[6] Fortress Conservation and International Accountability for Human Rights Violations Against Batwa in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, p. 37-38
[7] FORTRESS CONSERVATION AND INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST BATWA IN KAHUZI-BIEGA NATIONAL PARK, p. 37-38
WCS
According to the MRG Report:[1]
- Knowledge of Abuses: WCS has had actual and constructive knowledge of serious human rights violations by ecoguards and soldiers against the Batwa Indigenous community in PNKB since at least 2017. These included killings, shootings, torture, and the burning of children alive.
- Limited Response: In response to these incidents, WCS has largely relied on internal inquiries and communication with ICCN, the very body accused of the abuses. For example, following the killing of 17-year-old Christian Nakulire, WCS merely asked ICCN to investigate, raising concerns about conflict of interest and lack of accountability.
- Failure to Report: WCS failed to notify donors such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) of these allegations, even when it received grants to support security units accused of abuse. A U.S. Department of Interior investigation found WCS withheld critical information and was non-cooperative, citing burdensome data requests and internal retention policies.
- No Site-Specific GRM: While WCS has a Global Grievance Redress Mechanism, it did not establish a local, accessible, or culturally appropriate grievance mechanism in PNKB. Most Batwa are unaware of WCS, and there are no park-level structures to file complaints.
- Complicity in Militarization: Despite warnings from civil society in 2019 that ecoguards were threatening Batwa returnees, WCS continued funding, training, and equipping the Rapid Intervention Unit, a force accused of violent evictions and killings.
- Delayed Commitments: WCS only committed to setting up a GRM in PNKB after public scrutiny increased, particularly following reports like "To Purge the Forest by Force".
Public Image vs. Practice: While WCS has publicly praised ICCN and reaffirmed its commitment to PNKB conservation, it has not taken responsibility for its role in supporting militarized conservation or adequately addressed the systemic abuses.
IUCN -Kahuzi-Biega Whakatane Assessment (2014)
In September–October 2014, the Kahuzi-Biega National Park (PNKB) hosted the third Whakatane Assessment piloted by IUCN, following earlier assessments in Kenya (2011) and Thailand (2012). The initiative aimed to promote dialogue and address the rights and concerns of Indigenous communities affected by conservation.
Key components of the assessment included:
- 3D Mapping: Over 21 days, the Bambuti Indigenous Peoples from nearby clans created a detailed 3D map of their traditional territory. The map highlighted their deep cultural and social ties to the forest, underscoring how forest destruction would threaten their survival.
- Presentation & Dialogue: The map was presented during a meeting involving the Bambuti, PNKB authorities, IUCN, and ICCN, fostering mutual understanding of the Bambuti’s dependence on the land.
- Fieldwork: A three-day joint field assessment was conducted in Kabare, Bunyakiri, and Kalehe by representatives from ICCN, IUCN, the Forest Peoples Programme (FPP), CAMV, researchers, and an Ogiek representative from Kenya’s Whakatane process.
Outcome:
- The assessment initiated a promising dialogue between the Bambuti and park authorities. A preliminary roadmap was developed to address short-term needs—such as land access, health, education, jobs, and equitable benefit sharing—while aiming to build Bambuti capacity for long-term engagement. However, the process did not result in formal recognition of land titles, leaving key issues of territorial rights unresolved.[2]