Melghat Tiger Reserve

Last Updated
2024-03-12
Name of the Protected Area / Park / Reserve
Melghat Tiger Reserve
Country
India
Name(s) of the Impacted Indigenous People(s) / Community / Villages
Korku
Gawli
Gond
Balai
Halbi
Wnjari
Nihal
Burad
Rathiya
Information about Involved Institutions

Wildlife Conservation Trust (partnering with WRCS for capacity building workshops in Wildlife Law and Wildlife Crime prevention), 

WWF India, 

Wildlife Protection Society of India. 

Administrative Authority of the Protect Area / Park / Reserve and Contact Details

Chief Conservator of Forests and Field Director: 
Miss. Banerjee Jayoti
Off. 0721-2662792
ccfdmelghat2@mahaforest.gov.in

 

Divisional Forest Officer, Melghat Wildlife Division, Govt.Timber Depot Campus, Paratwada, Dist. Amravati
Pin Code 444807 
Ph.No - 07223-222643
Email ID - dfomelghatwl@mahaforest.gov.in 

National Conservation / Environment Agency or Ministry in Charge of the Protect Area / Park / Reserve

Maharashtra State Forest Department, National Tiger Conservation Authority (India).

Donor's Information

The project is being carried out in partnership with the Tiger Reserve authorities in the Core Zone and the territorial Forest Department in the buffer zone. 

WWF-India has been a partner in the Melghat project and has provided financial support from the beginning. WWF-India is also a partner in the environmental education program.

WRCS is part of a consortium, with the Forest Department as the main partner, that is recipient of a grant for tiger conservation in Eastern Maharashtra landscape.

In 2006, 2007, 2016, 2019 and 2021, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Multinational Species Conservation Fund provided funding to various implementing partners including the Wildlife Areas Development And Welfare Trust, Wildlife Research and Conservation Society and the U.S. Government - Department of Interior to: carry out  a survey for tigers and deploy camera traps for estimating tiger population in the Reserve (Project Number F19AP00744); conserve tigers in the buffer zone (Project Number:F16AP00912); monitor Tiger and Prey Population of the Reserve (Activity Id:50233) and to develop an education project (Activity Id:50196)[1].


 

Historical Background

Due to alarming statistics of tiger population decline caused by extensive 20th century industrialisation and agricultural reform, ‘Project Tiger’ was established under the government of Indira Gandhi in 1973. This was timed with the implementation of a number of environmental reforms in India, notably the passing of the Wildlife Protection Act in 1972 which governs conservation management. The Melghat Tiger Reserve was one of the first nine reserves to be notified under this nation-wide initiative (deemed a tiger reserve in 1974), and the area was chosen over the initially proposed Andhari and Kolsa lands as these were the favored hunting blocks of chief minister Vasantrao Nasik. The Melghat Tiger Reservewas declared Critical Tiger Habitat in 1974.It was later notified as a critical tiger reserve in 2007 following implementation of the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act. Melghat Wildlife Sanctuary was declared as in 1985.  It is located Northern part of Amravati district of Maharashtra. The Tapti River flows through the northern part of Melghat Tiger Reserve and forms the boundary of the reserve together with the Gawilghur ridge of the Satpura Range.

Short description of the alleged violations

There has been an extensive history of Indigenous displacement and dispossession since the creation of the Tiger Reserve in 1974, however, most of the documented violations have occurred in the past twenty years. 

In 2001, the Bori, Kund and Koha villages were reportedly relocated and in 2003 the process of relocating the Vairat, Churni and Dhargad villages commenced in 2003. 

In 2007, the Maharashtra government passed a resolution to relocate a further 87 villages from the main region designated a tiger reserve. Compensation of INR 10 lakh (12000 USD today) were offered to eligible families, however, Indigenous communities resisted removal and sought to reclaim their land under the Forest Rights Act 2006. These rights were largely rejected and the families were designated ‘encroachers’ to be forcibly relocated. A total of 1360 families were reportedly evicted in 2008[1].Since relocation, many Indigenous families have been subject to poverty and discrimination (especially in seeking employment) and have not been offered full compensation as promised. As the government has continued to displace tribal villages forcibly and with inadequate compensation and rehabilitation, Indigenous peoples have continued to organize in resistance and recognition of their land rights. 

 In 2015, families who could not proof their lands status in the villages of Dhakna, Sawrya, Bhandum, Borikheda, Gadgabhandum, Dabhiya, Dolar and Gadgamalur located in the reserve were allegedly removed by Special Protection Forces. In 2016, forest department officials allegedly burnt down the home of an Indigenous family built on forest lands and a park officer was arrested on rape charges.  In June 2017, nearly 600 families were relocated from Rohinkhidki village in the Amot wildlife division. The same year over 1200 Indigenous people returned to their ancestral forest lands and set up an occupation movement lasting 36 hours.  Impacted communities were reportedly not consulted and did not give their consent. Reported human rights violations would include torture, arbitrary arrests, intimidations, threats; criminalization, confiscation of livestock and filed criminal cases against villagers[2].  In January 2019, relocated tribal people demanded the forest department to return their land. Protests reportedly turned violent, with around 40 forest guards and members of the State Reserve Police Force getting injured.[3] In 2019, state police were deployed against another protest where 40 people were reportedly injured and 20 Indigenous land protectors were arrested. Throughout the timespan of dislocation, Indigenous peoples have furthermore been allegedly violently harassed and assaulted by forest department and local law enforcement officials, arrested, and reportedly ill-treated and tortured while in custody. In August 2022, Ankush Gorelal Mavaskar, a 25 year old Indigenous youth was tortured by forest staff when went fishing in the Wan forest area under Akot wildlife division of Melghat Tiger Reserve.

Categories of Human Rights Violations
Rights to land, territory and natural resources including access to means of subsistence, adequate food and adequate housing
Right to Consultation and Free and Prior Informed Consent
Social rights-including access to public services
Political Rights
Cultural Rights
Civil Rights
National Court Decisions

In 2019, the District Level Committee recognized community forest rights in a 3,000-hectare area to Madizadap villages which falls under the core area of the Melghat Tiger Reserve. In June 2020, the District Level Committee recognized individual forest claims of 76 people in Semadoh village within the core area of the Tiger Reserve.[1]

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court decision regarding a criminal trespassing notice against alleged “squatters/encroachers” in the park: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/67679454.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Bombay Environmental Action Group also filed a case in the Bombay High Court against the removal of the Indigenous Kordu peoples through denotification of the previous multiple use area in 1994, https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/simmering-9432 

Latest Developments

There has been some success regarding recent legal developments, where the District Level Committee has recognised tribal community forest and fishing rights within the Melghat Tiger reserve, to the disapproval of Melghat Tiger Reserve officials. In June 2020, the Committee further recognised the forest land rights claims of 76 individuals of the Semadoh community within the Reserve under the Forest Rights Act. 

However, violations against Indigenous communities have been ongoing and potentially worsening, Despite the police escalations against resistance in 2019, Indigenous communities continue to protest and advocate for recognition of their land and fishing rights and for adequate compensation/rehabilitation where relocation has been consented to.